Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free

CAS

  • or

358742-96-8

Post Buying Request

358742-96-8 Suppliers

Recommended suppliersmore

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

358742-96-8 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 358742-96-8 includes 9 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 6 digits, 3,5,8,7,4 and 2 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 9 and 6 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 358742-96:
(8*3)+(7*5)+(6*8)+(5*7)+(4*4)+(3*2)+(2*9)+(1*6)=188
188 % 10 = 8
So 358742-96-8 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

358742-96-8SDS

SAFETY DATA SHEETS

According to Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) - Sixth revised edition

Version: 1.0

Creation Date: Aug 14, 2017

Revision Date: Aug 14, 2017

1.Identification

1.1 GHS Product identifier

Product name methyl 2-(3,5-dimethoxy-1-methyloxycarbonyl-4-oxo-2,5-cyclohexadienyl)ace

1.2 Other means of identification

Product number -
Other names -

1.3 Recommended use of the chemical and restrictions on use

Identified uses For industry use only.
Uses advised against no data available

1.4 Supplier's details

1.5 Emergency phone number

Emergency phone number -
Service hours Monday to Friday, 9am-5pm (Standard time zone: UTC/GMT +8 hours).

More Details:358742-96-8 SDS

358742-96-8Relevant articles and documents

Synthesis and evaluation of 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid amides and 4-hydroxycinnamamides as antioxidants

Jung, Young-Sik,Kang, Tae-Souk,Yoon, Joong-Ho,Joe, Bo-Young,Lim, Hee-Jong,Seong, Churl-Min,Park, Woo-Kyu,Kong, Jae-Yang,Cho, Jungsook,Park, No-Sang

, p. 2599 - 2602 (2007/10/03)

4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid amides and 4-hydroxycinnamamides were synthesized and their antioxidant and neuroprotective activities were evaluated. Among the prepared compounds, 6f, 6g, 8b, and 9 exhibited potent inhibition of lipid peroxidation in rat brain homogenates, and marked DPPH radical scavenging activities. Furthermore, 6f, 6g, and 9 exhibited neuroprotective action against the oxidative damage induced by the exposure of primary cultured rat cortical cells to H2O2, xanthine/xanthine oxidase, or Fe2+/ascorbic acid. Based on these results, we found that 6f was the most potent antioxidant among the compounds tested.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 358742-96-8