22876-22-8Relevant articles and documents
Synthesis of benzoxazole associated benzothiazine-4-ones and their in vitro and in silico antimicrobial, antioxidant activities
Padmini,Vagdevi,Jinendra, Usha
, p. 137 - 150 (2021/01/06)
In present study, a series of 3-[(5-methyl-1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl)amino]-2-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-4H-1,3-benzothiazin-4-ones (6a-n) were synthesized and elucidated by elemental, FT-IR, 1H & 13C NMR and LC-MS studies. The in vitro antibacter
HMOX1 inducers
-
Page/Page column 88, (2020/09/18)
The present invention is related to compounds of structure (I) as heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX 1) inducers. The present invention is also related a method of controlling the activity or the amount, or both the activity and the amount, of heme-oxygenase 1 in a mammalian subject. The definitions of the variables are provided herein.
Design, synthesis, molecular docking, and anticancer activity of benzoxazole derivatives as VEGFR-2 inhibitors
El-Helby, Abdel-Ghany A.,Sakr, Helmy,Eissa, Ibrahim H.,Abulkhair, Hamada,Al-Karmalawy, Ahmed A.,El-Adl, Khaled
, (2019/08/27)
Novel series of benzoxazoles 4a-f-16 were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for anticancer activity against HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cells. HCT-116 was the most sensitive cell line to the influence of the new derivatives. In particular, compound 5e was found to be the most potent against HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 with IC50 = 4.13 ± 0.2, 6.93 ± 0.3, and 8.67 ± 0.5 μM, respectively. Compounds 5c, 5f, 6b, 5d, and 6c showed the highest anticancer activities against HepG2 cells with IC50 of 5.93 ± 0.2, 6.58 ± 0.4, 8.10 ± 0.7, 8.75 ± 0.7, and 9.95 ± 0.9 μM, respectively; HCT-116 cells with IC50 of 7.14 ± 0.4, 9.10 ± 0.8, 7.91 ± 0.6, 9.52 ± 0.5, and 12.48 ± 1.1 μM, respectively; and MCF-7 cells with IC50 of 8.93 ± 0.6, 10.11 ± 0.9, 12.31 ± 1.0, 9.95 ± 0.8, and 15.70 ± 1.4 μM, respectively, compared with sorafenib as a reference drug with IC50 of 9.18 ± 0.6, 5.47 ± 0.3, and 7.26 ± 0.3 μM, respectively. The most active compounds 5c-f and 6b,c were further evaluated for their vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) inhibition. Compounds 5e and 5c potently inhibited VEGFR-2 at lower IC50 values of 0.07 ± 0.01 and 0.08 ± 0.01 μM, respectively, compared with sorafenib (IC50 = 0.1 ± 0.02 μM). Compound 5f potently inhibited VEGFR-2 at low IC50 value (0.10 ± 0.02 μM) equipotent to sorafenib. Our design was based on the essential pharmacophoric features of the VEGFR-2 inhibitor sorafenib. Molecular docking was performed for all compounds to assess their binding pattern and affinity toward the VEGFR-2 active site.