Welcome to LookChem.com Sign In|Join Free

CAS

  • or

792959-99-0

Post Buying Request

792959-99-0 Suppliers

Recommended suppliersmore

  • Product
  • FOB Price
  • Min.Order
  • Supply Ability
  • Supplier
  • Contact Supplier

792959-99-0 Usage

Check Digit Verification of cas no

The CAS Registry Mumber 792959-99-0 includes 9 digits separated into 3 groups by hyphens. The first part of the number,starting from the left, has 6 digits, 7,9,2,9,5 and 9 respectively; the second part has 2 digits, 9 and 9 respectively.
Calculate Digit Verification of CAS Registry Number 792959-99:
(8*7)+(7*9)+(6*2)+(5*9)+(4*5)+(3*9)+(2*9)+(1*9)=250
250 % 10 = 0
So 792959-99-0 is a valid CAS Registry Number.

792959-99-0Downstream Products

792959-99-0Relevant articles and documents

Highly effective pincer-ligated iridium catalysts for alkane dehydrogenation. DFT calculations of relevant thermodynamic, kinetic, and spectroscopic properties

Zhu, Keming,Achord, Patrick D.,Zhang, Xiawei,Krogh-Jespersen, Karsten,Goldman, Alan S.

, p. 13044 - 13053 (2004)

The p-methoxy-substituted pincer-ligated iridium complexes, (MeO- tBuPCP)IrH4 (RPCP = κ3-C 6H3-2,6-(CH2PR2)2) and (MeO-iPrPCP)IrH4, are found to be highly effective catalysts for the dehydrogenation of alkanes (both with and without the use of sacrificial hydrogen acceptors). These complexes offer an interesting comparison with the recently reported bis-phosphinite POCOP (RPOCOP = κ3-C6H3-2,6-(OPR2) 2) pincer-ligated catalysts, which also show catalytic activity higher than unsubstituted PCP analogues (Goettker-Schnetmann, I.; White, P.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1804). On the basis of νCO values of the respective CO adducts, the MeO-PCP complexes appear to be more electron-rich than the parent PCP complexes, whereas the POCOP complexes appear to be more electron-poor. However, the MeO-PCP and POCOP ligands are calculated (DFT) to show effects in the same directions, relative to the parent PCP ligand, for the kinetics and thermodynamics of a broad range of reactions including the addition of C-H and H-H bonds and CO. In general, both ligands favor (relative to unsubstituted PCP) addition to the 14e (pincer)Ir fragments but disfavor addition to the 16e complexes (pincer)IrH2 or (pincer)-Ir(CO). These kinetic and thermodynamic effects are all largely attributable to the same electronic feature: O → C(aryl) π-donation, from the methoxy or phosphinito groups of the respective ligands. DFT calculations also indicate that the kinetics (but not the thermodynamics) of C-H addition to (pincer)Ir are favored by σ-withdrawal from the phosphorus atoms. The high νCO value of (POCOP)Ir(CO) is attributable to electrostatic effects, rather than decreased Ir-CO π-donation or increased OC-Ir σ-donation.

Post a RFQ

Enter 15 to 2000 letters.Word count: 0 letters

Attach files(File Format: Jpeg, Jpg, Gif, Png, PDF, PPT, Zip, Rar,Word or Excel Maximum File Size: 3MB)

1

What can I do for you?
Get Best Price

Get Best Price for 792959-99-0